Blume, Judy (1975) Forever. New York, NY: Antheneum
Plot Summary:
Girl meets boy. Boy and girl fall in love. Girl goes to Planned Parenthood. Girl and boy have sex. Girl and boy are separated. Girl falls in love with new boy. Girl breaks up with old boy. Boy is sad, but moves on. Girl is sad, but happy with new boy. At no point during the story does the girl get pregnant, catch a disease, or die.
Critical Evaluation:
This is perhaps the least inviting plot summary I have ever written, but to be perfectly honest Forever was one of the least interesting teen books I have ever read. It is possible that at one point in time Katherine and Michael both felt real and modern, but that time is no longer. Most of the prose is the opposite of compelling (“On Friday, right after school, I washed my hair. I couldn’t eat any dinner. My parents gave me a couple of funny looks…”) and what little personality comes through feels dated and forced. Without any emotional attachment or investment in either character, their romance and break-up failed to move me in any way.
I applaud Blume for her intentions and what she accomplished by writing a story about teens having responsible sex and not getting punished for it by fate or society. Yet, as sad as it is that such a story was and still is groundbreaking, and as much as I would include it in a young adult collection, I must admit I would have a hard time recommending this novel to any teens. It reads like a lecture; the fact that it is one I agree with does not by itself make it a pleasurable or worthwhile read.
Reader’s Annotation:
Katherine and Michael are in love, that part they know. Now the question is: should they or shouldn’t they?
Booktalking Ideas:
I would never book talk this title if I could help it. But if I absolutely had to, I would focus on the parts that make it revolutionary – the fact that the teens in the story decide to have sex and survive doing so.
Reading Level/Target Age:
4th grade/14 -19
Potential Controversy:
[Pardon me a moment while I wipe the tears of laughter from my eyes.]
Sadly, even unmarried adult women admitting to having sex is so controversial that public figures have no problem labeling law students “sluts” for speaking about birth control. So, needless to say, a book about an unmarried teen girl deciding to have sex? And going to Planned Parenthood? And not being punished for it? And then being the dumper not the dumpee? Yeah. This is the kind of title that has always been frequently challenged and sadly will continue to be challenged for quite some time. While its age and the popularity and respectability of its author cushions it from some criticism, they are by no means an impenetrable armor.
The one positive thing about the dry tone of the book is that is hampers its popularity and therefore also how much of a priority people make to challenge it. It also assists in combating accusations of luridness or obscenity. (Which, to be fair, was likely part of the reason it was written they way that it was.) When a challenge does come up, the best thing would be to focus on the fact that the teens in the story have responsible sex, that it is the right of individual parents to help their own children make reading choices, and that many parents and health professionals believe that it is extremely appropriate and useful for older teens to be reading stories about other teens sexual choices and exploring such ideas theoretically before making real life decisions about their own lives.
Reasons for Choosing This Title:
I have a bad habit of getting into arguments about Twilight. (You know what it’s like when people are wrong on the internet.) A lot of times people in these discussions say things like “kids should be reading Forever instead!” Now that I have read it, my answer will be: NO. Teens deserve books that have plots like Forever’s and yet are interesting reads and address desire like Twilight. Until we have more (any?) books like that, I’m not going to judge any teen for reading either.